Response To https://twitter.com/AtheistEngineer/status/738335688937119744

To me, two possible clarifications seem reasonably proposed: (a) the Bible does not seem to suggest that God's existence is "beyond the realm of nature", but that God is the infinitely-existent establisher of "nature". (b) the Bible seems to suggest that God's existence seems beyond the suggested humanly-perceived and understood subset of "nature". However, I seem to recall suggestion that many aspects of modern science were hypothesized before being perceived and subsequently accepted as "scientific fact". If so, lack of human perceptual verification or inclusion within the scientific organon does not seem to reasonably preclude the factuality of a premise. Apparently, therefore, "supernatural" as a label seems to offer no value to analysis of the apparently Biblically-proposed existence of God.

. The SIDP presentation seems to base its substantiation of God's apparently Biblically-suggested existence upon three apparent findings of science. What flaw in that reasoning might you perceive?