Response To https://twitter.com/CrispySea/status/747522039746072576

To me, I seem to have demonstrated that logically sound reasoning, based upon science's findings, depicts the apparently Biblically-suggested attributes of infinite existence, consciousness, omniscience, omnipotence, and (I haven't yet presented) supreme benevolence for the role of source of all other existence simply using energy. The current point of the discussion does not even take into account the apparent final piece of the presentation's reasoning that seems to strongly suggest God as the point of reference at the beginning of the existential sequence of events that (a) actually has the attributes that the presented reasoning has (for analysis' sake) thus far attributed to energy and (b) effects the behavior of energy that seems to demonstrate the presented attributes.

To me, the rebuttal criticism (of a refusal to accept that the presentation assumes too much and pretends where it does not assume too much) seems similar to all but one submitted rebuttal in that it seems unaccompanied by supportive reasoning. The one exception that seems to come to mind seems clearly demonstrated via response reasoning to be flawed. To me, such unsupported criticism seems therefore ad hominem. Nonetheless, I respect the perspective.