Response To https://twitter.com/NewbornTight/status/740160461413326848

To clarify, my point seems to be that your question seems likely illogical in the apparently current, real-life context since it seems to seek methodology for disproving the existence of the apparently likely existent. Apparently, since humans are limited-perception and fallible-perception beings, that seems as close to absolute of a statement as humans can make. To me, if humans weren't limited-perception and fallible-perception beings, the statement might be "your question is illogical in the current, real-life context since it seeks methodology for disproving the existence of the existent". To me, the apparently human need for assertion disclaimers does not seem to invalidate the apparently objective reality to which human, disclaimed assertion is intended to refer. Apparently as a result, from perspective that considers God's existence to be objective reality, presentation of that perspective in the form of a hypothesis does not seem to negate the apparent illogic of attempting to disprove that hypothesis' apparently underlying objective reality.

Response To https://twitter.com/THISSBRAVA/status/740039018071642112

I seem to respect the perspective. To me, the suggestion that the basis for distinguishing between right and wrong is human common sense does not seem to delineate the distinction between right and wrong, but simply seems to suggest a human-based point of reference responsible for distinguishing between right and wrong. To me, however, deference to human common sense does not seem to resolve the issue, because the authoritative basis for distinguishing between those who do and those who don't have common sense does not yet seem identified.

Response To https://twitter.com/NewbornTight/status/739993058368884736

To me, an important point regarding the desire to disprove God's apparently Biblically-suggested and science-findings'-paralleled existence seems to be that, if God does exist, God's existence seems impossible to disprove. Apparently, as a result, to me, to the extent that God exists, and to the extent that I propose that God exists, and to the extent that you are posing to me the question of how to prove that my proposal of God's existence is wrong, your apparently posed question seems illogical.