Response To https://twitter.com/jablomih/status/745750200216621056

If I might respectfully suggest, if I propose reconciled Biblical main message and science, and you counter by challenging Bible/science reconcilability, and I demonstrate the apparent evidentiary weakness of that counter by demonstrating reconciliation of multiple Biblical assertions apparently previously considered irreconcilable , and propose that (a) those reconciliations seem to logically render the remaining proposed conflicts reasonably considered at least potentially reconcilable, (b) the remaining conflicts seem relatively irrelevant to the apparent Biblical main message, (c) the apparent Biblical main message seems so much more important than those remaining proposed conflicts, (d) the apparent Biblical main message seems solidly reconciled to science, and I propose moving analysis forward to the apparent Biblical main message, if you then repeat the apparently resolved counter of challenged Bible/science reconcilability, the repeated, apparently reasonably resolved counter might be the cause of a circular discussion.