Response To https://twitter.com/jablomih/status/745795598029295616

If I might respectfully suggest, to me, your comments do not seem accurately described as having revealed flaws in the representation, but as having proposed a flaw of Bible/science irreconcilability that seems to have been falsified, and possibly proposed a flaw that the proposed substantiation of God's existence seems applicable to multiple schools of thought, an apparent observation that seems to support that proposed existence and its proposed substantiation thereof, rather than constitute a flaw therein. Apparently as a result, neither of the two proposed flaws seems to stand. Apparently, therefore, barring additional proposed flaws in the presentation thus far, analysis seems freed to move forward to other proposed substantiation.