10:04:15 AM <@ SIDPMod> Morning, all. ☺ I read a perspective that seems to propose reasons for the (apparently suggested) ineffectiveness of workplace sexual harassment claims.
The (apparently-proposed) reasons seem common to every intentional instance of social injustice: consideration of administrator quality of life as more valuable than that of those being administrated.
10:14:07 AM <@ SIDPMod> To me, the Bible seems to offer highest-value insight regarding this issue.
10:29:52 AM <@ SIDPMod> The Bible seems to emphasize via principle and example the subjectivity to perceptual error, including perception of comparative ethics-relevant value, that seems science-acknowledged as being intrinsic to humans, and the extent to which such non-omniscience seems to render humans unqualified for personal much less aggregate decision-making without omniscient God's guidance.
10:33:51 AM <@ SIDPMod> The Bible seems to suggest that the optimal decision-making structure seeks God's guidance regarding personal decisions and leaves God to manage the decisions of others, including the extent to which others' decisions seem to impact personal quality of life.
11:04:11 AM <@ SIDPMod> The Bible seems to also suggest that human dissatisfaction with the human (and apparently, quite likely short-sighted) perception of God's circumstance management seems incorrectly accepted by some as sufficient basis upon which to replace God with some other point of reference as priority decision-maker.
11:10:16 AM <@ SIDPMod> 1 Samuel 8 seems to offer a crystal-clear example of God directly addressing the potential for such perception and subsequent decision-making and explaining what the result would (apparently inevitably) be.
11:14:00 AM <@ SIDPMod> After thousands-to-millions of years of human existence and innovation, reports of intentional social injustice throughout human history seem to suggest that the apparently-suggested warning from God seems not to have been proven wrong.
