Response To https://twitter.com/reasonandlogic/status/728242861913874432

Perhaps the various versions of The Bible are due to the versionists' potentially conflicting interpretation of the Bible's original writings.

Science seems to suggest that all human perception essentially interprets sensory data. Apparently, therefore, all sensory data, perhaps especially verbal communication in which words potentially have multiple meanings, seems reasonably suggested to be open to interpretation. Potentially differing interpretation of communication seems a generally-accepted result of human communication.

However, to me, all 66 books of the Bible seem intended to convey the message that the key to optimal human experience is individual acceptance of God as primary relationship and sovereign authority. The SIDP discusses science's findings that seem to substantiate that message.

I welcome your thoughts.