Monday, May 01, 2017

Response To https://twitter.com/reasonandlogic/status/728263638801338368

To me, logic seems to suggest that, if given that a set of directives' transceiver is omnipotent God, and the receivers are fallible humans with the ability to choose to versus not to accept God as primary relationship and sovereign authority, and apparently as a result, make themselves more versus less available to perceive God's direction, as well as more versus less likely to implement it respectively, responsibility for social issues seems primarily attributed to humans rather than God.

I welcome your thoughts, including to the contrary.